Modified.
Bearbeitet am 06.06.2014 um 11:37 von drf
Not a font.
Modified.
Bearbeitet am 06.06.2014 um 11:12 von drf
If this is truly really old, it may not be a "font".
I'm thinking that it's best for one of the moderators here to chime in on this.
Bearbeitet am 05.06.2014 um 19:21 von Chronos
The two "t" and "i" letters don't match, so possibly not a font.
Repeated letters don't match each other - possibly not a font.
Quote: "I don't know how you can know a font is legit".
As one of the moderators here astutely put it; the font world is a "jungle". One would have to spend a copious amount of time researching the history of each font to offer a sanitary reply. Add to that, there's even a level of whore-dom within the realm of font designers themselves. Gah.
Bearbeitet am 05.06.2014 um 18:32 von Chronos
Alle Zeitangaben sind CEST. Es ist jetzt 08:16