This is the German edition of Rick Riordan’s “Magnus Chase”. Yeah. I know the font is Garamond or Sabon. However, I’m not interested in the main font. I’m interested in the rune font. So, could you identify it, please?

@donsshottype Nope, not the headline!

So what difference do you see?

@donshottype Well, I don’t mean the headline. I mean the symbols which are gonna be explained on that page.

The symbols do not match any of the Runic fonts that I checked.

I checked publication information in the “Magnus Chase” books and found the credit: “Rune art by Michelle Gengaro-Kokmen.”

I also checked the pdf versions of the books and found that they use raster images of the Runes.

So I doubt very much that they are from a font.

Michelle Gengaro-Kokmen's Rune renderings look like they are a version of some of the Anglo-Saxon Fuþorc Runes: ᚠ feoh, ᚢ ur, ᚦ thorn, ᚩ os, ᚱ rad, ᚳ cen, ᚷ gyfu, ᚹ wynn, ᚻ haegl, ᚾ nyd, ᛁ is, ᛄ ger, ᛇ eoh, ᛈ peordh, ᛉ eolh, ᛋ sigel, ᛏ tir, ᛒ beorc, ᛖ eh, ᛗ mann, ᛚ lagu, ᛝ ing, ᛟ ethel, ᛞ daeg, ᚪ ac, ᚫ aesc, ᚣ yr, ᛡ ior, ᛠ ear, plus ᛢ cweorth, ᛣ calc, ᛤ cealc, and ᛥ stan.
More info:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglo-Saxon_runes

There are other versions of Runes, as detailed in the Wikipedia article on Runes:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Runes

Compare Michelle Gengaro-Kokmen's Rune renderings to the following image by Jack Daniel showing the Anglo-Saxon Fuþorc Runes, with their names, meanings, and values in the Latin alphabet:

Jack Daniel's rendering provides an svg file with vector outlines of each Rune.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anglosaxonrunes.svg
and the actual svg:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b7/Anglosaxonrunes-editable.svg

Jack Daniel granted the right to use this work for any purpose without any conditions, so there does not appear to be any obstacle for using them to create a font that almost identical to Michelle Gengaro-Kokmen's Rune renderings.

A DIY project, or something to be contracted to a font-maker.